政策管理软件

在声明层面发挥作用的政策管理

别再管理没人读的 50 页文档。Dictiva 将政策分解为原子化、可验证的声明,每条声明独立进行版本管理、映射到法规,并跟踪理解情况。

Community 方案永久免费 · 无需信用卡

以文档为中心的模式已经失效

大多数组织仍在用 PDF、Word 文档和 SharePoint 文件夹管理治理。合规负责人起草一份 30 页的信息安全政策,通过电子邮件流转审批,有人把最终版本上传到共享盘。六个月后,已经没人记得哪个版本是现行版本。

传统的政策管理软件将这一流程数字化,却保留了同样的架构。文档仍是基本单位。您仍然无法验证单项要求,仍然无法在不手动打标签的情况下将一句话映射到监管控制项。法规变化时,您仍要在文档中逐一查找受影响的段落。

问题不在于工作流,而在于数据模型。

一种截然不同的方法

Dictiva 开创了以声明为基础的治理。政策不再以整体文档存储,每项治理要求都是一条原子化声明,可独立进行版本管理、映射和跟踪。

以声明为基础的架构

将政策分解为原子化、可验证的声明。每项要求独立存在,拥有各自的版本历史、成熟度级别和法规映射。

逐条声明的版本控制

在声明层面而非文档层面跟踪每一次变更。准确了解改了什么、谁批准的、何时批准。每项要求都有完整的审计追踪。

审批工作流

让声明经过可配置的审核与审批链。支持多级签批、自动升级和截止日期跟踪。

分发与确认阅读

在合适的时间把政策送达合适的人。跟踪谁在何时确认了哪些内容,并验证理解程度,而不只是勾选框。

即时搜索与发现

在毫秒内找到任何政策、声明或要求。在整个治理资源库中进行全文搜索,并支持分面筛选。

多框架法规映射

将声明同时映射到 SOC 2、ISO 27001、GDPR、HIPAA 等 40 多个框架。一条声明满足多个控制项,无需重复。

成熟度跟踪

按声明、领域和框架跟踪治理成熟度。可视化差距,并通过量化评分衡量长期进展。

AI 驱动的理解检测

不止于"我已阅读"勾选框。AI 将政策分解为理解问题,验证员工是否真正理解各项要求。

以文档为中心 vs 以声明为基础

传统政策管理工具与 Dictiva 以声明为基础的模式在架构上的差异。

维度传统工具
基本单位文档(10-50 页)声明(1-3 句)
版本管理整份文档逐条声明
法规映射手动标记段落逐条声明自动映射
理解检测"我已阅读"勾选框AI 分解式验证
跨政策复用复制粘贴共享引用
影响分析手动搜索即时反向查找
成熟度跟踪无法实现按声明、按领域

深入了解: 政策管理软件:2026 年选购指南

为治理专业人员打造

无论您管理 20 项政策还是 2,000 项,Dictiva 都能随您的计划扩展。

合规负责人

痛点: 花费数周进行手动政策审查和审计准备

使用 Dictiva: 即时生成审计就绪报告,附完整版本历史

CISO 与安全负责人

痛点: 无法了解哪些安全要求真正得到落实

使用 Dictiva: 覆盖所有安全政策领域的实时成熟度仪表板

法务与风险团队

痛点: 法规变化需要在数十份文档中手动查找

使用 Dictiva: 反向查找:查看受某项法规变化影响的所有声明

运营经理

痛点: 程序与其所落实的政策脱节

使用 Dictiva: 与声明关联、带分步流程的程序

企业级安全

SOC 2 Type II 架构
静态数据 AES-256 加密
基于角色的访问控制(RBAC)
完整的审计追踪
多租户数据隔离
99.9% 可用性 SLA
符合 GDPR 和 CCPA
定期渗透测试

常见问题

What is policy management software?
Policy management software is the system of record for an organization's internal rules: creation, review, approval, distribution, acknowledgement, and retirement. Traditional tools treat a policy as a single document. Dictiva treats it as a set of atomic statements, so each individual requirement carries its own version history, owner, approval state, and regulatory mappings.
What is the difference between policy management software and document management software?
Document management software stores and versions files. Policy management software governs the requirements inside them. A document system can tell you that version 4 of the security policy was approved in March; it cannot tell you which of the 40 requirements in that document changed, who owns each one, which ISO 27001 controls they satisfy, or whether employees understood them. Dictiva answers those questions because the statement (not the file) is the unit of record.
Is there a free policy management software option?
Yes. Dictiva's Community plan is free forever with no credit card required, and includes statement-first authoring, version history, approval workflows, and full-text search. Paid plans add multi-framework regulatory mapping at scale, AI comprehension verification, advanced maturity analytics, and higher usage limits.
What should enterprises look for in policy and procedure management software?
Five things separate enterprise-grade tools from document repositories: granular version control below the document level, configurable multi-stage approval routing, distribution with verified acknowledgement, mapping of a single requirement to multiple compliance frameworks without duplication, and an immutable audit trail. Add role-based access control and multi-tenant data isolation if you operate across business units or regions.
How does policy management software handle IT and security policies?
IT and security policies change faster than HR or finance policies and map to more external frameworks, so document-level versioning breaks down quickly. Decomposing them into statements lets you update a single control (a password rotation interval, an encryption standard) without reissuing and re-acknowledging the entire policy, and shows you instantly every framework that control satisfies.
How does compliance policy management software support audits?
Auditors ask requirement-level questions: show me the control, its approval history, and evidence it was communicated. Because Dictiva maps each statement to SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and 40+ other frameworks, audit prep becomes a filtered query rather than a document hunt: one statement can satisfy controls across several frameworks with no copy-paste duplication.
What is the difference between policy management and procedure management software?
A policy states what must be true; a procedure states how someone carries it out. Most policy and procedure management software stores both as documents and leaves the relationship implicit. Dictiva models them as separate linked objects: a statement carries the requirement, and a procedure carries the ordered steps that satisfy it. That link is what makes the pair auditable: you can show which procedure implements a given control, and which controls are left without any documented procedure at all.
How do you prove employees actually read and accepted a policy?
Distribution is not evidence. Dictiva issues acknowledgement requests scoped to a domain, an assembly, or an individual statement, records who responded and when, and keeps that record on an immutable audit trail. Because acknowledgement is scoped per statement rather than per document, amending one requirement re-triggers sign-off only for the people that requirement affects: you do not reissue a 40-page manual to the whole company to change a password rotation interval.
Does policy management software handle UK and multi-jurisdiction requirements?
Yes. Dictiva's regulatory library covers UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 alongside EU GDPR, the EU AI Act, ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, and 40+ other frameworks, with the relationships between them modelled explicitly: UK GDPR is recorded as transposing EU GDPR into domestic law, so a statement satisfying one is visibly linked to the other rather than duplicated. The interface is available in eight languages for organizations operating across regions.
Is policy management software worth it for a small business?
It is, once you have more policies than one person can hold in their head, usually well before the first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit. The cost that hurts a small team is not the tool, it is reconstructing approval history and acknowledgement evidence under audit deadline. Dictiva's Community plan is free forever with no credit card, so the practical question is whether to start capturing that history now or reconstruct it later.
What does policy lifecycle management software track?
The lifecycle runs draft, review, approval, publication, distribution, acknowledgement, periodic review, and retirement. Most tools track it at the document level, giving a 40-page manual a single status field. Dictiva tracks it per statement, so one document can legitimately hold requirements in four different states at once (two approved, one in review, one retired) and the dashboard surfaces which individual requirements are overdue rather than declaring the whole manual current. Ownership, next review date, and approval history attach to the requirement, not the file.
How much does policy management software cost, and how should you evaluate options?
Pricing is typically per user per month with an implementation fee, but the sticker price is rarely the deciding cost: migrating existing policies and the internal time to keep the tool current usually exceed it. Three questions separate options faster than any feature matrix: can one requirement map to several frameworks without being duplicated, is approval history queryable or merely archived, and can you evidence acknowledgement at the requirement level rather than the document level. Dictiva's Community plan is free forever, so all three can be tested against your own policies before any commitment.
Is policy management software different for healthcare, banking, or government?
The workflow is the same; the mapping burden is not. Regulated sectors carry overlapping obligations (HIPAA and HITRUST in healthcare; SOX, PCI DSS, and regulator-specific guidance layered over ISO 27001 in banking) and a single internal control often satisfies several at once. Document-based tools force one copy per framework, so every amendment becomes a multi-document edit and the copies drift. A statement-first model keeps one requirement mapped to many frameworks. Government adds records-retention and public-disclosure duties, both of which need an immutable audit trail rather than versioned files.
Can policy management software help write policies, not just store them?
Storage-first tools begin with an uploaded document, which means the writing happened elsewhere and arrives unstructured. Dictiva begins with the statement: you author individual requirements, tag each with its taxonomy and framework mappings, and assemble them into published policies. The order matters: a requirement written as a discrete, testable statement can be owned, mapped, and acknowledged, while the same requirement buried mid-paragraph cannot. AI drafting assists at the statement level, and comprehension checks verify that readers understood a requirement rather than confirming they opened a file.
Can you use SharePoint for policy management?
You can store policies in SharePoint, and many organizations do. What it does not provide is requirement-level structure: it versions the file, not the 40 rules inside it, so it cannot tell you which control changed, who owns it, which frameworks it satisfies, or who must re-acknowledge after an amendment. The common pattern is SharePoint as the document library plus spreadsheets tracking control mappings and sign-off, and the spreadsheets are where the audit trail breaks. Dictiva replaces that spreadsheet layer rather than the file store.

准备好让您的
政策管理现代化了吗?

加入正在用以声明为基础的治理取代文档混乱的组织。免费开始,需要时再升级。

无需信用卡 · 2 分钟完成设置